Monday, November 29, 2010
John Adams : Independence
After witnessing the incident happened at Concord when the British came, John Adams takes up the cause of independence. Along the process, John Adams try to persuade the congress to support him to supply an army. Viewing from a rhetorical point of view, I would like to analyze one of his speech in the scene where the rhetorical appeals play its role successfully. It is the speech where he is telling a story about his friend, General Warren who fell at Bunker Hill. The detail of the story to show how he has been shot through the head, bayoneted and stripped off of his clothes attract the audience who is the congress. Another story is about 400 ordinary civilian dead because of the attack. In this speech, John Adams used two important Pathos tools which are storytelling and volume control. Both tools should compatible and complementary to each other in order to persuade the audience successfully and in this scene, he did an excellent job in doing that. Thus, in the effect of persuading and patriotism arise from the congress from his speech, the congress agree to support the militia for Massachusetts and appointed George Washington as the man in charge of the army.
Monday, November 8, 2010
TRAIN: Chicago-to-Iowa City-to-chicago
well, the issues about high speed train from Iowa city directly to Chicago is still under hold. why would this happens though? there are still some issues about this case that we have to take care first.
well, here are some ideas that what can benefits all of us.
1. could reach each ends faster: since the train got 220 mph and were away from traffic
2. the whole journey will be safer and more comfortable: high class technology and security will make all the
passengers safe and feel more comfortable
3.should be more cheaper if compare to grayhound
4.more efficient
what would be the counter argument?
1. super costly
2. this thing wont make any profit
3.deforestation
4.would destroy some local business ( bus, aeroplane)
conclusion: YES, because the benefits is more than the cons.
the audience would be goverments.
well, here are some ideas that what can benefits all of us.
1. could reach each ends faster: since the train got 220 mph and were away from traffic
2. the whole journey will be safer and more comfortable: high class technology and security will make all the
passengers safe and feel more comfortable
3.should be more cheaper if compare to grayhound
4.more efficient
what would be the counter argument?
1. super costly
2. this thing wont make any profit
3.deforestation
4.would destroy some local business ( bus, aeroplane)
conclusion: YES, because the benefits is more than the cons.
the audience would be goverments.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)